Laws — Read Me First

The statutes that authorize and constrain everything in the other three regulatory sections of this vault.

Hierarchy: Statutes (U.S. Code) authorize regulations (CFR) which create the rules under which agencies procure (FAR/DFARS) and operate. When a client asks “where is that rule from?” you trace it up this stack until you hit a statute.

Sections

USC — U.S. Code

The codified federal statutes, organized by subject into 54 titles. This is the authoritative, permanent compilation of general laws enacted by Congress. Source: Cornell Legal Information Institute (law.cornell.edu/uscode/text), pulled and maintained by far-sync.

Filename convention: 10 USC 4022.md. Wikilink-ready — type [[10 USC 4022]] in a memo and it resolves to the note.

Every FAR and DFARS clause traces back to statutory authority. Common tracebacks from the acquisition side:

FAR/DFARSStatutory authority
FAR Part 12 (commercial items)10 USC 3453 (DoD) / 41 USC 1906 (civilian)
FAR Part 15 (negotiation, TINA)10 USC 3701 / 41 USC 3501
FAR Part 19 (small business)15 USC 644 (Small Business Act §15)
FAR Part 33 (protests)31 USC 3551 (CICA protest authority)
DFARS 252.227-7013 (tech data)10 USC 3771–3775
DFARS Part 225 Berry Amendment10 USC 4862
Specialty metals10 USC 4863
Anti-Deficiency Act31 USC 1341
Bona Fide Needs Rule31 USC 1502
SBIR / STTR15 USC 638
Other Transaction Authority10 USC 4022 (prototype) / 10 USC 4021 (R&D)
CFIUS50 USC 4565

Public Laws/

Enacted public laws by session and number (e.g., Pub. L. 117-263 for FY23 NDAA). Not every PL is codified into the U.S. Code; some sit as uncodified “notes” attached to USC sections. Annual NDAAs are here because they drive a large fraction of DoD policy each year before the text filters into DFARS via rulemaking.

Executive Orders/

Presidential executive orders that drive regulatory change. Examples that matter for defense contractors:

  • EO 14028 (May 2021) — Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity. Drove much of the current federal cyber agenda including software supply chain requirements.
  • EO 13873 (May 2019) — Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain. Basis for Section 889 and similar prohibitions.
  • EO 14034, EO 14017, EO 14110 — supply chain resilience, critical minerals, AI safety.

Why this section exists

Three reasons:

  1. Traceability. When a CO cites FAR 52.204-21, the question why does this clause exist? traces to Executive Order 13556 (CUI) and ultimately to statutes authorizing classified-information and information-security programs. Knowing the statutory root matters for arguing the clause doesn’t apply, for negotiating scope, and for litigating interpretation.
  2. Wikilink resolution. Memos that cite “10 USC 2533b” should have that link resolve to live statutory text, not a dead reference.
  3. Amendment tracking. Same git-tracked amendment history as the regs. When Congress amends 10 USC 4022, the next sync commits a diff and you can see what changed.

Pipeline

U.S. Code pulls from Cornell LII. The Cornell URL pattern is predictable:

  • Section-level page: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/{title}/{section}
  • Title index: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/{title}

The scraper parses the HTML (which has a clean, stable structure), extracts section text with paragraph lettering preserved verbatim (same non-negotiable as FAR: no paraphrasing of statutory text), and writes markdown notes under Laws/USC/Title N/.

Public Laws come from Congress.gov or govinfo.gov (official PDF / XML).

Executive Orders come from the Federal Register (which IS where EOs are officially published — they appear as Presidential documents).

Status

Folder scaffolding. The USC ingester is the next build. See far-sync — the existing pipeline will be extended with a USC-scraper module.